College Baseball logoCollege Baseball

Arizona vs. South Carolina: Slow Starts Derailed Three-Peat for Gamecocks

OMAHA, NE - JUNE 25:  The South Carolina Gamecocks team wait on the field after losing 4-1 and 2-0 in the series to the Arizona Wildcats after game 2 of the College World Series at TD Ameritrade Field on June 25, 2012 in Omaha, Nebraska.  (Photo by Harry How/Getty Images)
Harry How/Getty Images
John RozumCorrespondent IJune 26, 2012

South Carolina failed to three-peat, because Arizona controlled the each game from the beginning.

Despite being the two-time defending champions, the Gamecocks never got into an offensive rhythm during the finals, so the Wildcats offense decided to take the quick advantage instead.

And here's how South Carolina got derailed early on.



OMAHA, NE - JUNE 25:  Tanner English #3 of the South Carolina Gamecocks reacts to his strikeout in the fifth inning against the Arizona Wildcats during game 2 of the College World Series at TD Ameritrade Field on June 25, 2012 in Omaha, Nebraska.  (Photo
Harry How/Getty Images

For one, the Gamecocks only scored one run in each game of the 2012 College World Series. Coming in, South Carolina had racked up 17 runs in the previous four games, but Arizona was not intimidated.

Well, it all began with South Carolina having gone three-and-out through the first two innings of Game 1 and mustering up just one hit through five. By that time, the Wildcats had already built a 4-0 lead going into the sixth inning.

Looking at Game 2, the Gamecocks didn't get a base hit until two outs in the fourth inning. Unfortunately, innings five and six were both three-and-outs, so Arizona remained in command. And when the Gamecocks offense finally came alive toward the end, the Wildcats had built a 4-1 lead.


OMAHA, NE - JUNE 25:  Michael Roth #29 of the South Carolina Gamecocks pitches in the first inning against the Arizona Wildcats during game 2 of the College World Series at TD Ameritrade Field on June 25, 2012 in Omaha, Nebraska.  (Photo by Harry How/Gett
Harry How/Getty Images

South Carolina's pitching in Game 1 was more damaging to itself than Game 2, but neither were dominant enough to completely shutdown Arizona.

Lacking consistency from inning-to-inning, the Gamecocks were down 3-0 after just three innings in Game 1. Starter Forrest Koumas lasted only 2.1 innings and allowed four hits and three runs. Reliever Evan Beal didn't help much, though, as he gave up two more runs in five innings with seven hits.

As for Game 2, starter Michael Roth performed well in 6.2 innings but allowed three hits and one run through the first four innings. The Wildcats got the best of Roth early and only got more confident as the game progressed.


Beginning of Innings

It's a significant help to any team when the first batter of each inning has a sound plate appearance. Any kind of hit or walk obviously suffices, but so does continuously fighting off pitches with fouls ball to wear the pitcher down.

Unfortunately, South Carolina wasn't consistent enough at starting each inning off on a good note. Ten times did the first batter get out in the series, and 13 times did the first two batters fail to reach the bases.

Therefore, most of the work needed to score had to occur with two quick outs and nobody on base. Even for the two-time defending champions, that is a tough situation to constantly fight out of. In turn, it's no surprise South Carolina only managed two runs in two games and failed to win thrice consecutive times.


Follow John Rozum on Twitter.

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices