Twitter Reacts to Umpires Allowing Astros' Illegal Pitching Change vs. Angels

Tyler Conway@jtylerconwayFeatured ColumnistMay 9, 2013

One night after Oakland Athletics shortstop Adam Rosales was robbed of a game-tying home run against the Cleveland Indians, Major League Baseball is once again facing a big umpiring controversy. 

And if the social media reaction was any indication, this latest mistake could go down as one of the strangest rulings in recent league history. 

Let's set the scene. In the top of the seventh inning of Thursday's game between the Houston Astros and Los Angeles Angels at Minute Maid Park, Astros manager Bo Porter takes out pitcher Paul Clemens for Wesley Wright. Seeing that the lefty Wright was subbed in, Angels manager Mike Scioscia pinch-hits right-hander Luis Jimenez for left-hander J.B. Shuck—a common baseball move you see on a nightly basis. 

What happened next was nothing short of bizarre. Before Wright could face off against Jimenez, Porter again calls to his bullpen, taking out his left-handed pitcher in favor of righty Hector Ambriz—a move the umpires allowed.

By rule, a pitcher is supposed to face at least one batter after being brought into the game. Seeing an obvious breach of the rules, Scioscia was incensed. He argued vehemently with umpires about the move and placed the game under protest, according to ESPN's Buster Olney:

The Angels' official website later confirmed the protest. 

It was a bizarre scene, one that many folks took immediately to social media to react about. With that in mind, let's take a look around the Twittersphere and highlight some of the best reactions to the strange scene at Minute Maid Park. 

ESPN's Buster Olney tweeted out the exact rule Scioscia thought was broken:

There is a time and place for pulling punches—most pundits did not feel that was the case and went full-force toward Major League Baseball and its umpiring crews. Bleacher Report MLB lead writer Zachary Rymer seems to have had enough of the "human element" excuse used often by baseball purists:

Fox Sports' Ken Rosenthal called the whole scene "bizarre" and wondered what justification the umpires could possibly give: 

Again, "bizarre" seemed to be the in-vogue word. CBS' Scott Miller says the situation clearly favors the Angels and their manager:

If Major League Baseball agrees and upholds the protest, Thursday's game will be unprecedented. According to Astros radio broadcaster Robert Ford, the last time a protest was upheld was in 1986:

While most of the reaction was one of befuddlement, others used this as an opportunity to do their best 140-character Louis C.K. impersonation. Bleacher Report featured columnist Adam Wells noted the Angels might have only themselves to blame for being down against the lowly Astros:

Jeff Passan of Yahoo! Sports, citing Los Angeles' season-long struggles, said Scioscia might want to consider filing a longer-term protest than just for Thursday night:

Sports Illustrated's Joe Sheehan might be exaggerating a bit, but he does make a good point about the Angels' dreadful night bringing home runners in scoring position:

Because this is how things work in today's umpiring society, the Angels came back to take the lead in the bottom of the eighth inning and won 6-5. Sam Miller of Baseball Prospectus jokingly suggested they hold up the protest:

Some people, like ESPN's Jerry Crasnick, were happy to see Los Angeles win. Why? He doesn't want to see these two teams play again:

While Scioscia's Angels dug themselves out of the bad situation and won, a blatant missed call cannot go unpunished. Major League Baseball's umpiring problem has become one of the biggest stories of the 2013 season—almost to the point that it's dwarfing the on-field action.

While no one from the league has made a statement on Thursday night's game as of yet, you can bet plenty are anxiously awaiting what comes next. 


Follow Tyler Conway on Twitter: