UFC 161 logoUFC 161

UFC 161: Dustin Pague Loss Proves Judges Are as Incompetent as Ever

June 15, 2013; Winnipeg, Manitoba, CAN; Bantamweight Dustin Pague pins Yves Jabouin during UFC 161 at the MTS Center. Mandatory Credit: Bruce Fedyck-USA TODAY Sports
Bruce Fedyck-USA TODAY Sports
Z.G. HarrisContributor IIJune 15, 2013

Dana White once told MMAFighting.com that bad judging "kills my business" following a bout between Melvin Guillard and Jamie Varner at UFC 155.

Six months later, the judges are still killing the UFC. At UFC 161 on Saturday night, the split-decision victory for Yves Jabouin over Dustin Pague underscored one of the fundamental errors of scoring: Judges do not initially score the full guard as a neutral position.

Pague landed takedowns, partially locked multiple submissions and controlled a majority of the match. Instead of rewarding Pague for his work and control, the judges handed the decision to Jabouin based upon his patter of strikes, avoidance of snapped limbs and lying in top position for portions of the bout.

While Jabouin did have more top position than his opponent, he ended up there because Pague wanted a ground battle. Jabouin did very little with the position overall.

Submission attempts are the grappling version of significant strikes. They do damage, cause one to deviate from a strategy toward survival mode and expose that one fighter is not in control of the bout. Why then was Jabouin given the nod simply for not tapping out?

If Pague had been struck 200 times and managed to survive, the judges would not have awarded him a victory for remaining conscious.

A judge has no reason to assume a fighter wants to stand rather than possess full guard. With full guard, the fighter is susceptible to strikes but also possesses more opportunities for submission attacks.

A submission artist who possesses poor stand-up would naturally prefer the full guard over standing. A fighter who is facing an opponent with great submissions would be wise to stand and avoid his opponent's full guard.

Given those strategic truths, a judge cannot assume a fighter's full guard is a better or worse position than standing. Given that standing is neutral, full guard must then be considered neutral as well.

Pague deserved to win this fight, and the athletic commissions need to make scoring changes to ensure this doesn't happen again. While the judging criteria have many holes, here's an easy change to make: Full guard is neutral until a fighter proves to have the advantage.

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Download
Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BleacherReport.com is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices