After a disappointing draft lottery, which left the Sonics with the fourth pick, the Sonics' offseason could become confusing.
Clearly, the largest free agent in Seattle has potential to be the team itself. However, whether or not the team stays in Seattle, its future could be defined by this offseason.
The Sonics have a chance to have a huge, franchise-altering offseason. Only one championship team since the Sonics last won a ring has become the champion without the aid of at least one top six pick in the NBA draft. That team was the 1982-83 Philadelphia 76ers, who were led by Julius Erving and Moses Malone, both of whom started their careers in the ABA.
Also, many of those teams had several top six picks on their roster, at various positions.
It is very easy to look to the recent past to view the blueprint for moderate success. The Suns, Wizards, Nuggets and Hornets have all been able to turn the respective fortunes around very quickly.
However, there is an inherent problem with the way the former three teams have chosen to re-construct their rosters, and when using history as a guide, it is safe to say that as they sit, none of those teams will ever win a ring.
A lot of players’ scouting reports are wrought with cliché’s, meant as positives. But to the discerning eyes of devout basketball fans and purists, these clichés would shoot up red flags. Those are “hybrids who can play many positions,” “combo-guards” and nearly anything else which showcases a player’s “versatility.”
Generally speaking, players who are considered “hybrids” have the size from one position, a combination of skills from that position as well as another, and a lack of skills from both positions.
Of the past 30 champions, each teams’ top two players have been able to fulfill every requirement from at least one position. Arguments can be made that players like Scottie Pippen and Magic Johnson could play multiple positions, and they could. However, both were elite players at their natural positions, small forward and point guard respectively.
So with the Sonics out of the running for Derrick Rose and Michael Beasley, barring a trade, a lot of experts have projected the Sonics to take a combo guard like Jerryd Bayless or O.J. Mayo.
Considering the Sonics’ need for an upgrade at the point guard position, it seems like an easy decision to make. Take one of the two combo guards and develop them as the team’s point guard.
They’ll take some scoring pressure off of Kevin Durant and the two (Durant and either Mayo or Bayless) can develop together, returning the Sonics to prominence in the West.
Perhaps prominence is a relative term. However, with the opportunity to lay the foundation of a champion, why not follow the mold which has remained true for three decades?
Even the best Sonics teams since the 1978-79 championship team, the mid-90’s Gary Payton led Sonics, had defined roles.
comments (7) write a comment »
write a new comment
7 months ago
Completely agree that Durant should be moved to small forward. I have no idea why he played shooting guard last season. But I have to disagree with you about the Hornets having no shot to win a title. I wouldn't put anything past Chris Paul...
7 months ago
I was actually worried that wouldn't come out clearly.
"It is very easy to look to the recent past to view the blueprint for moderate success. The Suns, Wizards, Nuggets and Hornets have all been able to turn the respective fortunes around very quickly.
However, there is an inherent problem with the way the former three teams have chosen to re-construct their rosters, and when using history as a guide, it is safe to say that as they sit, none of those teams will ever win a ring."
The former 3 teams would the Nuggets, Wizards, and Suns. I completely agree with you on the Hornets. Paul is a much better distributor than he is given credit for, and Tyson Chandler is in the discussion for top 5 centers in the NBA.
They have also been able to survive/overcome the terrible signing of Peja Stojakovic, who has played well, but is signed to an awful contract.
7 months ago
If Lawson is gone, the team could look at Mario Chalmers at pick 24, as he can hit the open shot and would be a big defensive upgrade over Ridnour. I like the depth of this article.
7 months ago
Don't forget about Jeff Green, the top 10 pick out of Georgetown. With him and Durant, Seattle has a bright future. Yes, they do need a point gurad, but at the fourth pick there probably isn't a PG worthy that high. Like you said, Lopez and Mayo would be good picks but i dont' know if Mayo would work because he and Durant both would demand a lot of shots. You could trade down for a PG.
Durant plays the SF and Green will be at the PF so someone like Lawson or DJ Augustin would make good picks. They need to get a PG who distributes the ball and not a shot first one. Like you said, JJ Reddick would be a good pick up at the SG position. So if you draft a PG and pick up a shooter you'll have 4 players who will be in Seattle (i mean OK City) for a long time.
However, Durant needs to bulk up so he can be a force on the boards. Only average about 4 boards a game while at Texas he averaged about 12.
7 months ago
By the way, how is chandler a top 5 center? No way, Chris Paul made him a much better player. Kinda like Kenyon Martin when he was in NJ with Kidd.
Dwight Howard, Kevin Garnnet, Pau Gasol, Tim Ducan, Shaq, Yao Ming, and and Elton Brand are all better.
7 months ago
I actually hate OJ Mayo's game, but I didn't get into that.
Jeff Green plays the same natural position as Durant, and I think he was drafted as potential trade bait in the future, honestly. He's got potential to become a defender the likes of Ron Artest, with a very similar offensive game.
An interesting trade partner, in my opinion, would be the Nets. Perhaps I'll write something about trade possibilities at a later date.
Garnett isn't a true center, nor is Elton Brand. Shaq was better than Chandler a short time ago, but Chandler has far surpassed the Big Aristotle in my eyes. I do consider him a top 5 center, based on the criteria of a tradition center, whichs puts a major emphasis on the defensive end, however, I only stated that Chandler is "in the discussion." I could build a case against him also.
7 months ago
Well if Chandler is a top 5 center then its by default. He gets most of his points of lops to the basket and offensive put backs. He does rebound and play good defense though.
write a new comment