During Marco van Basten’s reign over the national team, the name of Mark van Bommel was a forbidden name. Van Bommel was deemed persona non grata in the national side, despite being one of Bayern Munich’s best players last season. Van Bommel missed out on Euro 2008 because of his row with Van Basten.
With the start of a new season came new hope for the tenacious Dutch midfielder. First of all in the form of his new manager at club level. New Bayern manager Jürgen Klinsmann made Van Bommel the new captain.
It was the first time ever in Bayern’s history that a foreigner was made “Kapitän,”the skipper of the team. Klinsmann went as far as calling Van Bommel “der neue Kahn”, a player with the same iconic value as legendary goalkeeper Oliver Kahn.
Second of all, he had high hopes for a fresh start in the national side. His father-in-law Bert van Marwijk was appointed as Marco van Basten’s successor and a new dawn brought a second chance for the ever-ambitious midfielder to win more trophies.
A few months into the new season however, it appears that Van Bommel’s dreams of glory are quickly turning into a nightmare. Klinsmann rewarded Van Bommel with the captains armband after an exceptional pre-season career, but right now “der Kapitän” is a captain without a ship to steer and a crew to command.
Choosing the right team captains always was an important point in football, but somehow “Klinsi” thinks he has made the wrong choice. It’s a pretentious assumption, but one based on facts.
Why else would a manager keep his skipper on the bench for seven consecutive matches? No injuries and bans during that period, Klinsmann just opted to field someone else in Van Bommels position.
To make it worse, the players that are fielded in his position were never any real competition for him in the previous season. Andreas Ottl was used as a wing-back, Martin Demichelis played as a central defender and midfielders like José Sosa, Toni Kroos and Tim Borowski were just not good enough to threaten his spot in the team.
- B/R Ticket Guide
At the start of the season, Klinsmann appeared to agree. How else could one explain his decision to grant Van Bommel the captaincy of one of the biggest clubs in European and World Football… You don’t make someone captain, only to drop him from the squad soon afterwards… Unless you feel you have made a mistake ofcourse.
It’s a question Dutch and German reports have been asking themselves over the past few months. Initially, Klinsmann claimed he was using a rotation-system and it was Van Bommels turn to sit on the bench. However, you don’t keep your captain on the side-lines for such a long period unless there’s something else going on.
Klinsmann’s second explanation sounded logical too, at first. Van Bommel wasn’t used to the new tactic Klinsmann wanted to use. He needed his skipper to get accustomed to the new tactic in training but he would get his spot back. The same rule, claimed Klinsmann, applied to every other player in the squad as well.
Now that sounds fair enough, but looking at Bayern’s disastrous start of the season, Van Bommel isn’t the only player that hasn’t quite adapted to the new tactics. International stars like Luca Toni, Lucio and Miroslav Klose have all handed in awful performances for the Bavarian side so far, yet they haven’t lost their spot, despite the presence of worthy replacements.
My guess is that Klinsmann has full confidence in Van Bommel and his capacities as a player and as a captain, but someone at the club cynically referred to as “FC Hollywood” hasn’t… It would explain why chairman Franz Beckenbauer claimed Bayern was interested in Italian pitt-bull Gennaro Gattuso last summer.
Chairman Franz Beckenbauer, “der Kaiser” or “the Emperor” of German football, is not an avid fan of Van Bommel. According to the ageing German legend, Van Bommel is too aggressive on the pitch and not in complete control of his emotions.
Someone like that, claims Beckenbauer, should not wear the captains armband and even though he doesn’t say it out loud, what he means is that someone like that shouldn’t even play for a club like Bayern.
Now regarding his behaviour, Beckenbauer has a point. Van Bommel is a player who constantly plays on the edge. He’s aggressive in his duels with other players, he dives, he moans, he fouls, anything to win the match. Players that play like this tend to get booked and Van Bommel is no exception to this rule.
Everything that Beckenbauer has said about Van Bommel so far is correct. But aren’t those the qualities you want for a defensive midfielder?
Your defensive midfielder is the hard man of the team, not afraid to get stuck in, throw himself infront of a shot to block it, or face off with opposition players. He’s the guy you expect to be a nasty bastard at times and Van Bommel does just that, and more.
He’s not just a hard tackling defensive midfielder, but he can deliver a great long range pass with his right foot, he’s got a considerable amount of creativity and he has the ability to be a match-winner with his penetrating runs forward and devastating shots. A total of 69 goals in just over 400 games is an impressive tally for a midfielder.
The question remains, what does the technical staff at Bayern expect from Van Bommel? He is fielded in the position of defensive midfielder, yet he is not allowed to play in an aggressive fashion. A defensive midfielder who keeps the gloves on at all times? Sounds like a pretty useless player to me.
Van Bommel is a player who is driven by his emotions and his fighting spirit. He can be a leader when things are looking bad for the team, his fighting spirit has worked inspirational when he was captain at PSV Eindhoven. Why would anyone want to take these qualities away from him?
Either way, he needs to reclaim his spot at Bayern, or he risks losing his spot in the national side as well, which would restore the status quo he was in back when Van Basten reigned supreme in Zeist (the offices of the KNVB are located in Zeist and this is the place where the squad always gathers).
To sum it all up, it looks like Van Bommel’s dreams of a new dawn are turning into a nightmare. Perhaps a move away from Bayern is the answer?
comments (16) write a comment »
write a new comment
about 1 month ago
Nice story. It sure looks like it is Klinsi that rather has his job secured by listening to the voices out the past than following his belief and vision.
I am sure Van Bommel is welcome back in Eindhoven.
from about 1 month ago
Agreed, any team would benefit from a player like Mark van Bommel being in the line-up. PSV could sure use him...
about 1 month ago
Roy Keane was in much the same mould for United (besides perhaps the diving) and he worked well as captain.
"Now that sounds fair enough, but looking at Bayern’s disastrous start of the season, Van Bommel isn’t the only player that hasn’t quite adapted to the new tactics", that sentence made me laugh.
nice writing Guido.
from about 1 month ago
Thanks Illya. I still don't understand why Bayern would want a defensive midfielder without an aggressive attitude. Every team needs a player like that.
about 1 month ago
good article guido. i'm surprised at how poor bayern have been this season. it seems like it is klinsmann's fault, especially when you don't play your captain for seven games. why bother making him captain if he isn't going to play him? only hopefully bayern can turn things round, and hopefully things get better for van bommel, both for bayern and for holland.
from about 1 month ago
It might be best for Mark to switch clubs if he doesn't get back into this Bayern team soon. The team is pretty poor right now and it's a disgrace Mark isn't getting a crack at first-team football right now.
about 1 month ago
Ive never liked the dude but I agree with the sentiments above. No point making a player captain if they're not gonna play in the games...
from about 1 month ago
Exactly. Plus every great team needs one or two players like him... Like Man Utd had Keane, France had Vieira, etc.
about 1 month ago
Great, great article Guido.
from about 1 month ago
Thanks Ryan.
about 1 month ago
i think he's past his best. He deserves to play for Bayern because he is the best they have though.
from about 1 month ago
It makes no sense not fielding your captain.
about 1 month ago
I've never like van Bommel - his antics against Arsenal in the CL final a few years ago just made me hate him quite a lot. I don't rate him as a player, and I'm not surprised that Bayern don't either!
Great article Guido.
from about 1 month ago
He's a dirty version of Keane or Gattuso, does what-ever it takes to win.
Thanks for the compliment Shyam.
about 1 month ago
I think he is still a good player but can be a liability because of his aggression. Klinsmann is looking too much into it and the fact that he is not changing it when they are not playing well is plain stupid. Germany started to play well in the World Cup when he started to cut the gimmicks and focus on the real things.
from about 1 month ago
Agreed. Bayern are playing so tame right now, they could use a healthy dose of aggression.
write a new comment