This is the 36th submission in a long series about Marion Jones, a former elite sprinter who won honour and earned endorsements, fame and fortune by method of fraud. This series introduces Victor Conte into the picture.
Keane and Graham decided the best course of action was to argue points the prosecution made rather than call their own witnesses, and, on Tuesday, May 27, 2008—when court resumed, they allowed the prosecution to rest its case.
Keane stated during his closing argument that Graham could only be found guilty if his statements made to Novitzky were “material to an ongoing investigation,” or the BALCO investigation. Keane said that because Heredia was not charged in the case, Graham's statements about Heredia were of no consequential value to an investigation of him or BALCO.
The prosecution, in its closing arguments, stated that Graham had, in fact, lied to keep investigators away from both him and Heredia. Heredia, Assistant U.S. Attorney Finigan stated, had been pinned as a drug connection with certain athletes, and speaking with Graham about Heredia was germane to the investigation.
Presiding Judge handed down a decision on the case of The United States v. Trevor Graham on Oct. 21. After Graham having billed this one as a trial for the ages, with more revelations and skeletons to be revealed from behind closed doors, Graham received the lightest punishment of anyone yet involved in this case from within the athletics circle.
Trevor Graham, whose family has supported him throughout this trial and has been in his corner every step of the way, will have plenty of time to thank them as he spends the next 12 months in home confinement, and pay a $5,000 fine back to the government for his part played in the BALCO case. Graham, unlike Marion Jones and Victor Conte, will spend neither a minute nor a moment behind enemy lines—also known as prison.
Enter Victor Conte.
There are a lot of adjectives I’ve heard folks use to describe Victor Conte.
Words like “snake-oil salesman,” purported “liar” and “saviour of track and field” have all come back to recollection from the years since I’ve heard Conte’s name mentioned with nutrition products. I tend to describe Conte with the following Italian proverb: “He is not an honest man who has burned his tongue and doesn't tell the company the soup is hot.”
Conte may be a lot of things to a lot of people, however, truth be told, he is also a criminal—a man who was charged with 42 counts of steroid distribution and money laundering in connection with BALCO investigations, and convicted on two of those allegations, thanks in large part to Trevor Graham.
Conte’s historical athletics persuasion has been beset with corruption and controversy, and he has left an indelible stain on the fabric upon which this sport has been carefully knit together despite his attempts to turn over a new leaf and help stop what he allowed to continue in motion when he joined in the spreading of performance-enhancing drugs to athletes.
Conte's back in business with a connection of “people who have won medals at World Championships and other elite people who have won at the same level in other sports—it’s best for them and me to keep their names out of it.”[1]
Calling Victor Conte the “mastermind” behind the deception created by the undetectable drugs known as THG and “the clear”—two drugs which were discovered after Trevor Graham provided a syringe to the UCLA laboratory Dr. Don Catlin previously managed—would feed an ego so consumed with self-admiration, that the heavens above would not be wide, nor deep, nor vast enough to contain this man’s sense of accomplishment in trifling those attempting to stay at a pace consistent—or better—than the drug cheats, and those who help them get away with it.
Graham, as you well know, turned in the drug for reasons understood to be anything but “doing the right thing.”
Conte says he was driven to create these drug regimes for athletes not by money but because of “the challenge,”[2] and further stated to the world:
Running a successful doping operation “was about much more than developing drugs and methods. It was a network of people; to win any war, you need intelligence. I had access to information from people that were inside the labs. I would find out what they were doing in terms of testing designer steroids.
“I know of an accredited lab in Europe that had an employee who was coming in at night and doing prescreening of urine samples for athletes – to help these athletes beat tests and monitor clearing times. What I’m saying is, it’s not about the drugs, it’s about knowing who’s doing what, when and where.”[3]
Conte made millions off of his legal nutritional products before turning over to the lure of developing performance-enhancing drugs, and following his bust and resurrection, Conte is back at it again.
Conte’s tongue could appear parched from inconsistencies and deception surrounding the BALCO testimony, but one component of truth remains through it all: The reality about Marion Jones’s steroids regime—a fact which took four years to prove—as verified as being authentic.
One consistent factor with Victor Conte’s testimony prior to—and after—Marion Jones’s self-confession was that Conte had asserted her guilt ever since the BALCO testimony began in 2003.
Marion Jones’s attorneys had categorically denied those accusations, but were not able to discredit Conte to the desired extent to which they had planned.
An excerpt of their attempts to paint Conte into a liar and as an un-trustworthy person unable to deliver the truth is found below.
“Victor Conte is someone who is under federal indictment, facing serious prison time and has a record of issuing a host of contradictory, inconsistent statements,” Nichols said in a statement.
“Victor Conte's allegations are not true and the truth will be revealed for the world to see as the legal process moves forward.”[4]
Conte was a suspect under federal indictment, however he was not facing serious prison time as Nichols suggested.
Legal experts—peers in the field to Nichols—anticipated Conte not receiving more than two years in prison if he were to be convicted of all charges in a trial.
Concerning Conte’s evidences of contradictions he is stated to have made, could not Nichols have provided common people following the events an idea of how far, how wide and how deeply wild and contradictory Conte was alleged to have been in his statements of athletes and their drugs-usage—particularly Marion Jones, and his subsequent denials of guilt.
Furthermore, with respect to revelations of the truth, was any unfavourable evidence ever uncovered to discredit the claims Conte was making, namely that Marion Jones was taking performance-enhancing drugs which Conte, himself, provided to her and witnessed her use?
Conte would not have been impeached as a witness based on what Nichols deemed to have been inconsistent testimony, because Conte did not make any variable statements under oath. Had Conte been forced to make statements under oath, he would have stated the same ones to which he made outside of the courtroom, namely that Marion Jones was, indeed, a doped athlete during her career—a fact to which she finally admitted and had been charged and found guilty to a certain degree.
Conte, when one listens to his voice, sounds sincere, seasoned, and a man with a story he’d like to tell calmly and collectively. A challenge facing the jury of public opinion is determining if Conte, despite his disfigured tongue, was at any point ever telling the truth—this despite the Marion Jones’s “confession.”
Later in the course of this series, you’ll read of past stars like Edwin Moses, Sebastian Coe and Steve Cram wishing upon a star that Conte would simply go away and stop convoluting the vision folks have of athletics.
comments (0) write a comment »
write a new comment
This article has no comments.