The New York Knicks have officially traded Jamal Crawford in a straight-up deal for Golden State’s Al Harrington.
According to the New York Post, the move is in effort to clear salary space for 2010 (the chic GM move of the season).
"Donnie (Walsh's) plan is pretty clear that in a couple of years we'll be under the cap," Mike D'Antoni said. "Everything we do will lead us to the possibility of being under the cap in two years. Then I'll deal with making sure the team is competitive. We're not going to compromise our future because we might take a half-step."
IMPLICATIONS
New York: The deal creates cap space, obviously, but how will Al Harrington fit into D’Antoni’s system. Harrington is the prototypical D’Antoni big man with his ability to run, dribble, and shoot 3’s. So what becomes of Wilson Chandler?
D’Antoni has raved all year long about the development of his second year player, even comparing Chandler to Shawn Marion. Since Chandler insertion as the starting power forward, he has averaged 15 points on 52 percent shooting to along with five rebounds, one steal, and a three.
The likely scenario is for the star in bloom to shift down to the three for a starting lineup of Chris Duhon, Quentin Richardson, Chandler, Harrington, and Zack Randolph.
Perhaps, Harrington comes off the bench for the Knicks. In that case, who starts at the two-guard: Nate Robinson or, could it be, Stephon Marbury. Has the whole Starbury saga been a ploy to showcase Crawford in hopes of moving him so that the Knicks can make room for Marbury and acquire a needed piece to their roster, all while saving cap space. Donnie Walsh is a genius, reign in the new Marbury-D’Antoni era..I don’t think so.
Golden State: This is a great move for the Warriors. They get rid of Harrington–a malcontent and a player out of rotation for Jamal Crawford–for someone who will flourish as the point guard they desperately need while Monta Ellis is out. When Ellis returns, this trade gives Don Nelson the flexibility to insert him back to his natural position, two guard, while Crawford continues to manage the point.
True, Crawford is far from a true point guard, but as Stephen Jackson has proven, you don’t need to be a true point in order to run Nellie ball. One simply must be an adequate passer (check) while still being a scoring/shooting threat (double check). Furthermore, at 6-foot-5, Crawford has the ability to defend opposing shooting guards, allowing Ellis the luxury to defend smaller point guards.
Winner: Push
Golden State vastly improves their roster while the Knicks make an initial step towards clearing cap space while adding a player who should fit nicely into D’Antoni’s new system.
MORE TRADES
There are also rumors about the New York Knicks dumping Zach Randolph’s salary on the Los Angeles Clippers in exchange for Cuttino Mobley and Tim Thomas’ expiring contracts.
If Donnie Walsh is successful in trading Randolph, the Knicks could potentially be around $57 million dollars under the cap in 2010–assuming they decline to resign David Lee and Nate Robinson.
LeBron James dawning "New York" across his chest in 2010–the Knicks (and seemingly ever other franchise) keep the dream alive.
comments (5) write a comment »
write a new comment
about 1 month ago
crazy day in ny huh....we don't have much to look forward to for a while now so we gotta just keep watching this video of nasty nate robinson dancing to put a smile on our faces lol: http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1859735478?bclid=1859720801&bctid=2454972001
about 1 month ago
Look for the Knicks to move Lee for a mid round type first round pic.(Maybe they get their pic back from Utah??) Move him now before people realize they aren't gonna resign him.
Also keep in mind, the 5 position is now wide open, and whomever excels their between Curry and Jefferies, will in escence be auditioned for the trading of their contract. I see Curry getting healthy quick.. but maybe more realistic is Jefferies playing the 5 for the rest of this year as shot blocker and foul shooting dissaster!!
If the Knicks move LEe for a future pic, and Curry, they get enough $$$ to pursue two super stars.
They will keep NATE! No doubt!
about 1 month ago
Yeah, I definetly hope they keep Nasty Nate. He's one of my favorite players and has a chance to be one of the leagues best sixth man (men?) for years to come.
about 1 month ago
It seems like a Nicks vs. Nets battle. With the Nets looking to move to Brooklyn (Lebron's favorite borough) and his friend Jay-Z being a minority owner (minority meaning a small % owner, no racism intended) would you say the Nets are the front runners?
Perhaps they are going after one of the other big fish like Dwayne, Amare or Dirk. Your thoughts?
about 1 month ago
I would think the Knicks are the front runners for the simple fact the Nets move to Brooklyn is on hold. Plus the Knicks have tradition and the world's most famous sports arena on their side. Nets will always be second fiddel to the Knicks. But maybe LeBron goes to the Nets to change that?
write a new comment